FEDERAL ENERGY ADMINISTRATION ET AL.

v.

ALGONQUIN SNG, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (41 total)

• Roselene Alfred v. Fla. Dep't of Labor & Emp. Sec., 487 So. 2d 355 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
  …ressly prohibited from employment by the INS or has not been granted authorization to work, is not “able and available” to work for the purpose of unemployment benefits. See Alonso v. State, 50 Cal.App.3d 242, 123 Cal.Rptr. 536 (1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 903, 96 S.Ct. 1492, 47 L.Ed.2d 752 (1976); Duenas-Rodriguez v. Industrial Commission, 199 Colo. 95, 606 P. 2d 437 (1980); Lepiani v. Board of Review, Department of Labor and Industry, 169 N.J.Super. 72, 404 A. 2d 318 (1979); Bastas v. Board of Review, D…
• United States v. Alfredo Fernandez "Chino" "Al" Alfonso, 552 F.2d 605 (5th Cir. 1977)
  …ntext.14 The evidence reread was closely related to the material requested by the jury, and the manner of its presentation indicated the court’s complete impartiality. See United States v. Gentile, 525 F. 2d 252, 260-261 (2 Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 903, 96 S.Ct. 1493, 47 L.Ed.2d 753 (1976). The extreme length of the rereading proceedings does not indicate prejudice per se; nor do we find any evidence of prejudice in the record as recounted by appellants. Neither do we find that the evidence rerea…
• United States v. Skeeter Cyphers and David Willman, 553 F.2d 1064 (7th Cir. 1977)
  …as “penalized” by the district court’s vigilant regard for his right to a fair trial. See Gori v. United States, 367 U.S. 364, 366-69, 81 S.Ct. 1523, 6 L.Ed.2d 901 (1961); United States v. Gentile, 525 F. 2d 252, 255-58 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 903, 96 S.Ct. 1493, 47 L.Ed.2d 753 (1975). The important consideration, for purposes of double jeopardy analysis, “is that the defendant retain primary control over the course to be followed in the event of . error.” United States v. Dinitz, supra, at…