CLAUDE PHILLIPS, PETITIONER,
v.
SUN OIL COMPANY ET AL., RESPONDENTS
CLAUDE PHILLIPS, PETITIONER,
SUN OIL COMPANY ET AL., RESPONDENTS
203 So. 2d 153
Florida Supreme Court (1967)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission hearing date June 22, 1967.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petitions for certiorari and for attorney’s fees are therefore denied.
It is so ordered.
CALDWELL, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Webb Dean v. McLEOD, 270 So. 2d 726 (Fla. 1972)…ut has been considered previously by the Industrial Relations Commission, and the Commission’s findings in the case sub ju-dice follow the reasoning of the earlier cases. In Ratliff v. Guerdon Industries, Inc., F.I.C. decision No. 2-1638; cert. den. 203 So. 2d 153 (Fla.1967), the Commission considered an attempt by a claimant to petition for modification of an order denying an earlier petition for modification, and the result was the same as that reached in the case sub judice: “In our opinion, this is not p…