WOROZBYT

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (87 total)

• Patton v. Yount, 467 U.S. 1025 (U.S. 1984)
  …a careful and thoroughgoing manner”); United States v. Duncan, 598 F. 2d 839, 865 (CA4), cert. denied, 444 U. S. 871 (1979); Calley v. Callaway, 519 F. 2d 184, 209, n. 45 (CA5 1975) (en banc) (citing cases), cert, denied sub nom. Calley v. Hoffman, 425 U. S. 911 (1976). But cf. Smith v. Phillips, 455 U. S. 209, 222, and n. (1982) (O’CONNOR, J., concurring) (describing situations in which state procedures are inadequate to uncover bias); Rideau v. Louisiana, 373 U. S. 723 (1963) (same). Demeanor plays a fun…
• Library OF Congress v. Shaw, 478 U.S. 310 (U.S. 1986)
  …ust compensation,’ ‘discount,’ ‘offset,’ or ‘penalty,’ or any other term, because it is still interest and the no-interest rule applies to it.” United States v. Mescalero Apache Tribe, 207 Ct. Cl. 369, 389, 518 F. 2d 1309, 1322 (1975), cert. denied, 425 U. S. 911 (1976). [*322] Respondent claims, however, that interest and delay represent more than mere semantic variations. Interest and a delay factor, according to respondent, have distinct purposes: the former compensates for loss in the use of money, while…
• Aluminum Co. of Am. v. Cent. Lincoln Peoples' Util. Dist., 467 U.S. 380 (U.S. 1984)
  …r whenever there is a preference customer willing to buy it. See City of Santa Clara v. Andrus, 572 F. 2d 660, 670-671 (CA9), cert. denied, 439 U. S. 859 (1978); Arizona Power Pooling Assn. v. Morton, 527 F. 2d 721, 727-728 (CA9 1975), cert. denied, 425 U. S. 911 (1976). In Part II-C of its opinion, ante, at 398-400, the Court points out that the higher rates charged to DSIs provide a subsidy for certain consumers served by investor-owned utilities, implying, I suppose, that it makes good sense to sell the…