OLDEN

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By

• Scott v. United States, 436 U.S. 128 (U.S. 1978)
  …d been connected with a wrong number? “A. That is correct, Your Honor.” App. 179. The Court of Appeals, with four judges dissenting, denied rehearing and rehearing en banc, 173 U. S. App. D. C. 118, 522 F. 2d 1333 (1975), and we denied certiorari, 425 U. S. 917 (1976). Mr. Justice Brennan, Mr. Justice Marshall, and Mr. Justice Powell dissented from the denial of certiorari. The specific statutes under which petitioners were convicted were repealed in connection with the enactment of the Comprehensive Drug…
• United States v. Henning Heldt and Duke Snider, 668 F.2d 1238 (D.C. Cir. 1981)
  …92, 696-97 (5th Cir. 1972); United States v. Holmes, 452 F. 2d 249, 259 (7th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1016, 92 S.Ct. 1291, 31 L.Ed.2d 479 (1972). See generally United States v. Scott, 516 F. 2d 751, 760 n.19 (D.C.Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 917, 96 S.Ct. 1519, 47 L.Ed.2d 768 (1976) (dictum noting agreement with the rule.) In the following section, we outline the standards for judging the reasonableness of a document search, and explain why the government’s actions — taken as a whole— do n…
• United States v. Hyde, 574 F.2d 856 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …lso justified this approach. Several courts have expressly approved the procedure followed here, and we join them. The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, in United States v. Scott, 170 U.S.App.D.C. 158, 516 F. 2d 751 (1975), cert. denied 425 U.S. 917, 96 S.Ct. 1519, 47 L.Ed.2d 768 (1976),6 wrote: * * * the only feasible approach to minimization is the gradual development, during the execution of a particular wiretap order, of categories of calls which most likely will not produce information re…