VIGIL

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• United States v. Gardner, 611 F.2d 770 (9th Cir. 1980)
  …ng of electronic surveillance and the Government’s response, we give greater weight to the testimony, which was subject to cross examination, than to the affidavits. See Matter of the Grand Jury, 524 F. 2d 209, 216 (10th Cir. 1975), cert. dismissed, 425 U.S. 927, 96 S.Ct. 1526, 48 L.Ed.2d 170 (1976). . Gardner relies on this court’s decision in Lenske v. United States, 383 F. 2d 20 (9th Cir. 1967). In Lenske, however, the accuracy of the chart used by the Government was vigorously and effectively challenge…
• Athlone Indus., Inc. v. Consumer Prod. Safety Comm'n, 707 F.2d 1485 (D.C. Cir. 1983)
  …dministratively under section 20, it apparently directed the Commission to cease that practice. . 15 U.S.C. §§ 1381-1431 (1976 & Supp. V 1981). . Id. § 1398(b) (1976). . Ford Motor Co. v. Coleman, 402 F.Supp. 475, 479-80 (D.D.C.1975), aff'd mem., 425 U.S. 927, 96 S.Ct. 1656, 48 L.Ed.2d 170 (1976). . The Commission argues that our reading of the statute renders meaningless section 20(c) which, according to the Commission, gives it authority to determine the final amount of the civil penalty. Appellees’ B…
• United States v. Saade, 652 F.2d 1126 (1st Cir. 1981)
  …552 F. 2d 940, 943 (2d Cir. 1977). Those courts presented with allegations similar to Saade’s have doubted that they form an actionable claim. See In re Archuleta, 561 F. 2d at 1062: In re Vigil, 524 F. 2d 209, 214 (10th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 927, 96 S.Ct. 1526, 47 L.Ed.2d 170 (1976). Because many of the decisions of this question arise in the context of a contempt proceeding against a grand jury witness, the somewhat different considerations implicated by a criminal defendant’s claim may…