WORKMEN ET AL.

v.

DUKE POWER CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Marine Midland Bank-Central v. Cote, 351 So. 2d 750 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977)
  …rize entry. E. g, Hollembaek v. Alaska Rural Rehabilitation Corp., 447 P. 2d 67 (Alaska 1968); Gill v. Mercantile Trust Co., 347 S.W. 2d 420 (Mo.App. 1961); Benschoter v. First Nat’l Bank of Lawrence, 218 Kan. 144, 542 P. 2d 1042 (1975), app. dism., 425 U.S. 928, 96 S.Ct. 1656, 48 L.Ed.2d 170 (1976) (where security agreement granted creditor “the remedies of a secured party under the Kansas Uniform Commercial Code,” creditor had privilege to enter); Ikovich v. Silver Bow Motor Car Co., 117 Mont. 268, 157 P.…
• Parks v. "MR. Ford", 556 F.2d 132 (3d Cir. 1977)
  ….), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1039, 95 S.Ct. 526, 42 L.Ed.2d 316 (1974), and the Supreme Court’s summary disposition of Benschoter v. First National Bank, 218 Kan. 144, 542 P. 2d 1042 (1975), appeal dismissed for lack of a substantial federal question, 425 U.S. 928, 96 S.Ct. 1656, 48 L.Ed.2d 170 (1976).10 The latter judgment, through summary, is authoritative until overruled. Hicks v. Miranda, 422 U.S. 332, 95 S.Ct. 2281, 45 L.Ed.2d 223 (1975). But this court has recognized that there is a significant distinct…

  ← 1 / 2 →