HUNNICUTT

v.

ESTELLE, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. McPARTLIN, 595 F.2d 1321 (7th Cir. 1979)
  …ly apart from the matter of ‘propensity,’ it has a tendency to make the existence of an element of the crime charged more probable than it would be without such evidence.” United States v. Fairchild, 526 F. 2d 185, 189 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 942, 96 S.Ct. 1682, 48 L.Ed.2d 186 (1976) (emphasis added). Ingram forwards three attacks on the admission of this evidence. First, he claims, the prior payments to Caniero were not sufficiently similar to the payments for which he was indicted to est…
• United States v. Williams, 577 F.2d 188 (2d Cir. 1978)
  …etion under Rule 403, see note 6 supra, to admit relevant other crimes evidence. See, e. g., United States v. Gubelman, supra, 571 F. 2d at 1255-56; accord, United States v. Fair-child, 526 F. 2d 185, 189 (7th Cir. 1975) (Stevens, J.), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 942, 96 S.Ct. 1682, 48 L.Ed.2d 186 (1976). Judge Goettel waited until the close of the Government’s case before admitting the prior conviction. We find no error in this exercise of discretion, since the probative value of the evidence was not “substant…
• United States v. Hardeman Jackson, 542 F.2d 403 (7th Cir. 1976)
  …0 U.S. 911, 93 S.Ct. 974, 35 L.Ed.2d 274. Thus, there is necessity for inquiry into the other factors that go into the balance. Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. at 530, 92 S.Ct. 2182; United States v. Fairchild, 526 F. 2d 185 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 942, 96 S.Ct. 1682-83, 48 L.Ed.2d 186. However, the duration of the delay alone does not establish a denial of speedy trial since there is “no constitutional basis for holding that the speedy trial right can be quantified into a specified number of days…