HARRIS

v.

CITY OF COLUMBUS, OHIO

Citator

Cited By

• Hayes v. Walker, 555 F.2d 625 (7th Cir. 1977)
  …quires a “ ‘written statement by the factfinders as to the evidence relied upon and reasons’ for the disciplinary action.” Wolff, 418 U.S. at 564, 94 S.Ct. at 2978, cited in Aikens v. Lash, 514 F. 2d 55, 60 (7th Cir. 1975), vacated on other grounds, 425 U.S. 947, 96 S.Ct. 1721, 48 L.Ed.2d 191, reinstated as modified on other grounds, 7 Cir., 547 F. 2d 372; Burbank v. Twomey, 520 F. 2d 744 (7th Cir. 1975). As the Court stated in Wolff, the considerations underlying this requirement are the protection for a p…
• Arsberry v. Allyn R. Sielaff, 586 F.2d 37 (7th Cir. 1978)
  …relied primarily upon Miller. On appeal, the state conceded that procedural protections were required and argued only that the District Court had gone too far. This Court affirmed. 514 F. 2d 55, 57 n.5 (7th Cir. 1975). However, the Supreme Court, 425 U.S. 947, 96 S.Ct. 1721, 48 L.Ed.2d 191 (1976), vacated the judgment and remanded for reconsideration in light of Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 96 S.Ct. 1551, 47 L.Ed.2d 810 (1976). By the time Aikens was reconsidered, Meaehum and Montanye had been dec…