DAVIS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (34 total)

• United States v. Hewitt, 663 F.2d 1381 (11th Cir. 1981)
  …ariaGonzalez, 547 F. 2d at 294. Finally, the hypothetical question did not cause Hewitt’s reputation witness to alter her evaluation of Hewitt’s reputation in the community. See United States v. Dovalina, 525 F. 2d 952, 957 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 953, 96 S.Ct. 1729, 48 L.Ed.2d 197 (1976); United States v. Curtis, 644 F. 2d at 270.19 AFFIRMED. . Title 18 of the United States Code, section 844 provides in pertinent part: (h) Whoever— (1) uses an explosive to commit any felony which may be pros…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Augustus Charles Bobo, 586 F.2d 355 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …been decided in this circuit. But cf. United States v. Hicks, 524 F. 2d 1001, 1003 (5th Cir. 1975) (only confessions which “directly inculpate” the defendant must be excluded), cert, denied, 424 U.S. 946, 96 S.Ct. 1417, 47 L.Ed.2d 353, cert, denied, 425 U.S. 953, 96 S.Ct. 1729, 48 L.Ed.2d 197 (1976). The Sixth Circuit has held that a redaction to replace the defendant’s name with “blank” is not enough if the jury would be compelled by other evidence in the case to infer that the defendant was “blank.” Hod…
• United States v. Dennis, 786 F.2d 1029 (11th Cir. 1986)
  …r an objection on other grounds will not suffice. See United States v. Haynes, 573 F. 2d 236, 241 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 850, 99 S.Ct. 154, 58 L.Ed.2d 153 (1978); United States v. Hicks, 524 F. 2d 1001, 1004 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 953, 96 S.Ct. 1729, 48 L.Ed.2d 197 (1976). Since the defendants did not object to the grand jury’s testimony on the grounds they now urge on appeal, we are limited in our review to reversal on those grounds for plain error. See Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(b). Find…