ANTHONY THEODORE BELL, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Harlan Glen LAY v. State, 224 So. 2d 369 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969)
  …the state. Inconsistent with Rule 1.850, F.S.A. the trial court erred in not granting an evidentiary hearing on this motion. Estrella v. State, Fla.App.1968, 215 So. 2d489; Bush v. State, Fla.App.1968, 209 So. 2d 696; Bennett v State, Fla.App. 1967, 203 So. 2d 211. This cause is reversed and remanded for complete and prompt evidentiary hearing. WALDEN, C. J., and McCAIN and REED, JJ., concur.…
• McCALL v. State, 224 So. 2d 370 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969)
  …ll refuted. Fact questions raised by petitioner on a Rule 1.850 motion or unrefuted claims of a coerced plea of guilty entitle petitioner to a hearing by the trial court. Jones v. State, Fla.App.1964, 165 So. 2d 191; Bennett v. State, Fla.App.1967, 203 So. 2d 211. McCall also claims that he is entitled to be appointed counsel on his Rule 1.850 motion. There is no absolute organic right to counsel in Rule 1.850 motions and only when complicated circumstances are present and potentially due process may be den…

Authorities Cited

• Morgan Simpson v. State, 165 So. 2d 195 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964)
• Otice Moore Taylor v. State, 183 So. 2d 865 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)