DOUGLAS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (24 total)

• Mazaleski v. Treusdell, 562 F.2d 701 (D.C. Cir. 1977)
  …sions in the Supreme Court and the courts of appeals. See Paul v. Davis, supra, 424 U.S. at 710, 96 S.Ct. 1155; Sims v. Waln, 536 F. 2d 686, 690 n. 4 (6th Cir. 1976); Barrett v. Smith, 530 F. 2d 829, 834-35 n. 6 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. [*715] denied, 425 U.S. 977, 96 S.Ct. 2179, 48 L.Ed.2d 801 (1976); Burnley v. Thompson, 524 F. 2d 1233, 1240 (5th Cir. 1975). See also Bishop v. Wood, supra, 426 U.S. at 348, 96 S.Ct. 2074; Powers v. School District, 539 F. 2d 38, 42 (10th Cir. 1976); Albach v. Olde, 531 F.…
• United States v. Parker, 549 F.2d 1217 (9th Cir. 1977)
  …488 F. 2d 287 (5th Cir. 1974). Although Parker argues that the officers had ample opportunity to obtain an arrest warrant, this argument, even if true, does not invalidate his arrest, United States v. Burnett, 526 F. 2d 911 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 977, 96 S.Ct. 2179, 48 L.Ed.2d 801 (1976).4 The Prosecutor’s Closing Argument in the Case of Parker Finally Parker argues that his conviction on Count IV should be reversed on the ground that the prosecutor improperly commented on his failure to .test…
• United States v. Perez-Esparza, 609 F.2d 1284 (9th Cir. 1979)
  …rly erroneous. See United States v. Cortez, 595 F. 2d 505, 507 (9th Cir. 1979) (“clearly erroneous” standard applies to district judge’s finding of “founded suspicion”); United States v. Rocha-Lopez, 527 F. 2d 476, 477 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 977, 96 S.Ct. 2181, 48 L.Ed.2d 802 (1976) (“founded suspicion” and “reasonable suspicion” mean the same). The tip by the reliable informer identifying the car driven by Perez-Esparza as one used to smuggle narcotics into the United States from Mexico p…