TIME, INC.

v.

VIRGIL

Citator

Cited By (21 total)

• The Fla. Star v. B. J. F., 491 U.S. 524 (U.S. 1989)
  …life is to continue to be reasonably acceptable. The public’s right to know is, then, subject to reasonable limitations so far as concerns the private facts of its individual members.” Virgil v. Time, Inc., 527 F. 2d 1122, 1128 (1975), cert. denied, 425 U. S. 998 (1976). Ironically, this Court, too, had occasion to consider this same balance just a few weeks ago, in United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of Press, 489 U. S. 749 (1989). There, we were faced with a press reques…
• Ne. Dep't Ilgwu Health & Welf. Fund & Sol Hoffman v. Teamsters Local Union NO. 229 Welf. Fund, 764 F.2d 147 (3d Cir. 1985)
  …be interpreted according to federal substantive [common] law, ... the Company’s cause of action joining EEOC ‘arises under’ laws of the United States”), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 425 U.S. 987, 96 S.Ct. 2196, 48 L.Ed.2d 812 cert. denied, 425 U.S. 998, 96 S.Ct. 2215, 48 L.Ed.2d 823 (1976). Although the Supreme Court’s decision in Franchise Tax Board of the State of California v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern California, 463 U.S. 1, 103 S.Ct. 2841, 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983), casts…
• Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm'n v. Ford Motor Co., 645 F.2d 183 (4th Cir. 1981)
  …; probably would create havoc in employer/employee relations, especially if the Company is unionized; and might be in clear violation of the employer-employee contract. See Meadows v. Ford Motor Co., 510 F. 2d 939, 949 (6th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 998, 96 S.Ct. 2215, 48 L.Ed.2d 823 (1976), (“.. . where the burden of retroactive pay falls upon the party which violated the law, the burden of retroactive seniority for the [*207] determination of layoff would fall directly upon other workers who them…