UNITED STATES
v.
WONG
UNITED STATES
WONG
426 U.S. 905
Supreme Court of the United States (1976)
Caution
Cited by 21 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (21 total)
-
Est. OF Mary Elizabeth Whitney Tippett v. City OF Miami, 645 So. 2d 533 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)…agueness challenges to similar historic preservation ordinances. Penn Central, 438 U.S. at 132-33, 98 S.Ct. at 2663-64; Mayes v. City of Dallas, 747 F. 2d 323 (5th Cir.1984); Maher v. City of New Orleans, 516 F. 2d 1051 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 905, 96 S.Ct. 2225, 48 L.Ed.2d 830 (1976); Second Baptist Church v. Little Rock Historic Dist. Comm’n, 293 Ark. 155, 732 S.W. 2d 483 (1987); Bohannan v. City of San Diego, 30 Cal.App.3d 416, 106 Cal.Rptr. 333 (1973); Figarsky v. Historic Dist. Comm’n, 1…
-
Califano v. Sanders, 430 U.S. 99 (U.S. 1977)…h “contains an independent grant of subject-matter jurisdiction, without regard to the amount in controversy,” afforded the District Court jurisdiction of respondent’s complaint. 522 F. 2d, at 1169. We granted certiorari sub nom. Mathews v. Sanders, 426 U. S. 905 (1976). We reverse. II A The Court of Appeals acknowledged that its construction of § 10 of the APA as an independent grant of subject-matter jurisdiction is contrary to the conclusion reached by several other Courts of Appeals. 522 F. 2d, at 11…
-
United States v. Washington, 431 U.S. 181 (U.S. 1977)…ce. See United States v. Calandra, 414 U. S. 338 (1974); United States v. Blue, 384 U. S. 251 (1966); Lawn v. United States, 355 U. S. 339 (1958). Respondent’s cross-petition seeking review of this portion of the Court of Appeals’ ruling was denied, 426 U. S. 905 (1976), and the validity of the indictment is not an issue in this case. Though both courts below found no effective waiver of Fifth Amendment rights, neither court found, and no one suggests here, that respondent’s signing of the waiver-of-rights…
Previewing 3 of 21 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence