ALBRIGHT, ADMINISTRATOR

v.

R. J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Kehm v. The Procter & Gamble Mfg. Co., 724 F.2d 613 (8th Cir. 1983)
  …ning foreseeability in strict liability relates to intended use. We have previously acknowledged that “intended use” is merely a convenient adaptation of the test of foreseeability. See Polk v. Ford Motor Co., 529 F. 2d 259 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 907, 96 S.Ct. 2229, 48 L.Ed.2d 832 (1976); and Passwaters v. General Motors Corp., 454 F. 2d 1270, 1275 (8th Cir. 1972). Under strict liability the knowledge of the danger is otherwise imputed to the defendant. Proof of a subsequent remedial modificatio…
• Conair Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 721 F.2d 1355 (D.C. Cir. 1983)
  …oned exercise of its expert judgment. See NLRB v. Gissel Packing Co., 395 U.S. 575, 612 n. 32, 615-16, 89 S.Ct. 1918, 1939 n. 32, 1940-41, 23 L.Ed.2d 547 (1969); Amalgamated Clothing Workers v. NLRB, 527 F. 2d 803, 807 (D.C. Cir.1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 907, 96 S.Ct. 2229, 48 L.Ed.2d 832 (1976). A. Conair’s Conduct The ALJ concluded that “the extensive unfair labor practices committed by [Conair] . .. are so ‘outrageous’ and ‘pervasive’ as to ... render[] impossible a fair election.” 261 NLRB at 1285…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• United States v. Scop, 846 F.2d 135 (2d Cir. 1988)
  …he testimony of a witness whose credibility is in question may be brought out on cross-examination and may not affect the foundation for admission of the opinion itself. See, e.g., Polk v. Ford Motor Co., 529 F. 2d 259, 271 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 907, 96 [*144] S.Ct. 2229, 48 L.Ed.2d 832 (1976); Twin City Plaza, Inc. v. Central Surety and Ins. Corp., 409 F. 2d 1195, 1200 (8th Cir.1969); 3 J. Weinstein & M. Berger, Wein-stein’s Evidence ¶1705[01], at 705-6 to -10 (1987); McCormick on Evidence § 1…