HICKS
v.
UNITED STATES; DAWN, DBA GAME CO. V. STERLING DRUG, INC., ET AL.; LYON V. CALIFORNIA
HICKS
UNITED STATES; DAWN, DBA GAME CO. V. STERLING DRUG, INC., ET AL.; LYON V. CALIFORNIA
426 U.S. 930
Supreme Court of the United States (1976)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Celio Castro and Ralph Alfonso, 596 F.2d 674 (5th Cir. 1979)…as here, a statement does not directly allude to the defendants, United States v. Hicks, 524 F. 2d 1001, 1003 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 946, 96 S.Ct. 1417, 47 L.Ed.2d 353; 426 U.S. 953, 96 S.Ct. 1729, 48 L.Ed.2d 197, rehearing denied, 426 U.S. 930, 96 S.Ct. 2640, 49 L.Ed.2d 382 (1976); United States v. Grillo, 527 F. 2d 1344 (5th Cir. 1976), no rights are abridged. Even were the Greene statements more incriminating as regards Alfonso, we would be loath to reverse on his account since it was h…