CASTANEDA, SHERIFF

v.

PARTIDA

Citator

Cited By (50 total)

• Castaneda v. Partida, 430 U.S. 482 (U.S. 1977)
  …titled to prevail. We granted certiorari to consider whether the existence of a “governing majority” in itself can rebut a prima facie case of discrimination in grand jury selection, and, if not, whether the State otherwise met its burden of proof. 426 U. S. 934 (1976). III A. This Court has long recognized that “it is a denial of the equal protection of the laws to try a defendant of a particular race or color under an indictment issued by a grand jury . . . from which all persons of his race or color ha…
• Connecticut v. Teal, 457 U.S. 440 (U.S. 1982)
  …3 1980); EEOC v. Navajo Refining Co., 593 F. 2d 988 (CA10 1979); Friend v. Leidinger, 588 F. 2d 61, 66 (CA4 1978); Rule v. International Assn. of Ironworkers, 568 F. 2d 558 (CA8 1977); Smith v. Troyan, 520 F. 2d 492,497-498 (CA6 1975), cert. denied, 426 U. S. 934 (1976); Williams v. City & County of San Francisco, 483 F. Supp. 335 (ND Cal. 1979); Brown v. New Haven Civil Service [*461] Board, 474 F. Supp. 1256 (Conn. 1979); Lee v. City of Richmond, 456 F. Supp. 756 (ED Va. 1978). The Court cites language fr…
• United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …indictment will be accepted as true in deciding a Rule 8(b) motion.” United States v. Levine, supra, at 663. See United States v. Salinas, 601 F. 2d 1279, 1292 (5th Cir. 1979); United States v. Nims, 524 F. 2d 123, 126 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 934, 96 S.Ct. 2646, 49 L.Ed.2d 385 (1976). . The government’s interpretation rests on some admittedly broad language in Elliott that suggests that RICO was intended to alter traditional conspiracy concepts. For example, we stated in Elliott that throu…