CAMPBELL

v.

COUSINS, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• Godinez v. Moran, 509 U.S. 389 (U.S. 1993)
  …however, have indicated that the competency standard for waiving the right to counsel is “vaguely higher” than the competency standard for standing trial, see United States ex rel. Konigsberg v. Vincent, 526 F. 2d 131, 133 (CA2 1975), cert. denied, 426 U. S. 937 (1976); United States v. McDowell, 814 F. 2d 245, 250 (CA6), cert. denied, 484 U. S. 980 (1987); Blackmon v. Armontrout, 875 F. 2d 164, 166 (CA8), cert. denied, 493 U. S. 939 (1989), and one of them has stated that the two standards “may not always…
• United States v. Foster, 711 F.2d 871 (9th Cir. 1983)
  …ever value it may have; such evidence is to be given its natural probative effect as if it were in law admissible.” United States v. Johnson, 577 F. 2d 1304, 1312 (5th Cir.1978); United States v. Bey, 526 F. 2d 851, 855 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 937, 96 S.Ct. 2653, 49 L.Ed.2d 389 (1976). It is also possible that Ashcraft was testifying as to- his own opinion based on his prior education and training, field observations, and a chemical analysis of the contents of the balloons. It is true that…
• United States v. Bubar, 567 F.2d 192 (2d Cir. 1977)
  …elebrated trials of the past.” . The issue alternatively might be cast as one of waiver. We prefer, however, Judge Fein-berg’s perceptive observation in United States ex rel. Konigsberg v. Vincent, 526 F. 2d 131, 133-34 (2 Cir. 1975), cert, denied, 426 U.S. 937 (1976), that “[a]t least . . . where [a defendant] was under no pressure to forego the assistance of counsel” and “where [he was] vehemently asserting his right of self-representation” such a case “is not truly a case of waiver of a constitutional r…