ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO. ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Mizokami Bros. OF Ariz., Inc. v. Mobay Chem. Corp., 660 F.2d 712 (8th Cir. 1981)
  …and the merits of the claim are not precluded.6 Victory Highway Village, Inc. v. Weaver, 634 F. 2d 1099, 1101 (8th Cir. 1980); Aeree v. Air Line Pilots Association, 390 F. 2d at 202-03; Vorbeck v. McNeal, 407 F.Supp. 733, 736 (E.D. Mo.), aff’d mem., 426 U.S. 943, 96 S.Ct. 3160, 49 L.Ed.2d 1180 (1976). Forum Non Conveniens. As an alternative basis for decision the district court granted Mobay’s motion to dismiss on grounds of forum non conveniens. On appeal, Mizokami contends that the court incorrectly ass…
• Nely L. Johnson v. Sedley N. Stuart, 702 F.2d 193 (9th Cir. 1983)
  …any book. The teachers rely on Epperson v. Arkansas, 393 U.S. 97,89 S.Ct. 266,21 L.Ed.2d 228 (1968), Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190, 97 S.Ct. 451, 50 L.Ed.2d 397 (1976), and Vorbeck v. McNeal, 407 F.Supp. 733 (E.D.Mo.1976) (three-judge court), aff’d 426 U.S. 943, 96 S.Ct. 3160, 49 L.Ed.2d 1180 (1976), as authority that even though the statute has not been enforced against them and there is no threat of such enforcement, the mere existence of the statute chills their exercise of free speech as teachers and i…
• Beverlin v. Bd. OF Police Comm'rs OF Kan. City, 722 F.2d 395 (8th Cir. 1983)
  …a closer degree of control over police than over firefighters. Whether this decision is correct or not, whether it represents wise policy, is not our affair. Furthermore, Vorbeck v. McNeal, 407 F.Supp. 733 (E.D.Mo.) (three-judge court), aff’d mem., 426 U.S. 943, 96 S.Ct. 3160, 49 L.Ed.2d 1180 (1976), is controlling, as the District Court pointed out. There, a three-judge district court held “[t]hat the Section 105.510 exclusion of police officers from the bargaining procedures enunciated in Section 105.520…