STOVER ET AL.

v.

CHICANO POLICE OFFICERS ASSN. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (26 total)

• Pinter v. Dahl, 486 U.S. 622 (U.S. 1988)
  …the under [*636] lying illegality. The plaintiff must be an active, voluntary participant in the unlawful activity that is the subject of the suit. See Woolf v. S. D. Cohn & Co., 515 F. 2d 591, 604 (CA5 1975), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 426 U. S. 944 (1976); see also Bateman Eichler, 472 U. S., at 312. “Plaintiffs who are truly in pari delicto are those who have themselves violated the law in cooperation with the defendant.” Perma Life, 392 U. S., at 153 (Harlan, J., concurring in part and disse…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Huddleston v. Herman & MacLEAN, 640 F.2d 534 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …ho have also participated in the perpetration of the fraud is an issue that has not been decided by this circuit. See Woolf v. S. D. Cohn & Co., 515 F. 2d 591, 605 & n.7 (5th Cir. 1975) (recognizing without deciding the issue), vacated and remanded, 426 U.S. 944, 96 S.Ct. 3161, 49 L.Ed.2d 1181 (1976). But see our dicta in Kuehnert v. Texstar Corp., 412 F. 2d 700, 705 n.7 (5th Cir. 1969). A number of district courts37 and two circuit courts 38 have recognized the right to [*557] contribution in Rule 10b-5 a…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Sundstrand Corp. v. SUN Chem. Corp., 553 F.2d 1033 (7th Cir. 1977)
  …hat a reasonable [investor] would consider [the omitted facts or misrepresentations] important in deciding” whether to invest. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc., 426 U.S. 438, 449, 96 S.Ct. 2126, 2133, 48 L.Ed.2d 757; S. D. Cohn & Co. v. Woolf, 426 U.S. 944, 96 S.Ct. 3161, 49 L.Ed.2d 1181. Applying this test, we believe the following misrepresentations and omissions were material and that Sundstrand relied thereon.7 As to 1968, Huarisa represented to Sundstrand that SKI would earn $2.6 million or $2.9…