SAKRAIDA
v.
AG PRO, INC.; RODRIGUEZ ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; PRESTON, AKA RILLA V. GRAY, WARDEN

U.S. | 1976-06-21
Nos. 75-110; No. 75-1240; No. 75-6152
426 U.S. 955 Supreme Court of the United States (1976) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Ashland OIL, Inc. v. DELTA Resins & Refractories, Inc., 776 F.2d 281 (Fed. Cir. 1985)
    …ve had any relevance to the obviousness/nonobviousness determination. . For support for this proposition the district court cited to: Sakraida v. Ag Pro, Inc., 425 U.S. 273, 283, 96 S.Ct. 1532, 1538, 47 L.Ed.2d 784, 189 USPQ 449, 453, reh’g denied, 426 U.S. 955, 96 S.Ct. 3182, 49 L.Ed.2d 1194 (1976) ("[Producing a desired result in a cheaper and faster way, and enjoying commercial success ‘without invention will not make patentability.’ ”); Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp., 3…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw