SLONE ET AL.

v.

DESKINS BRANCH COAL CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (16 total)

• Verdell Wright v. State, 351 So. 2d 708 (Fla. 1977)
  …Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, agreed that unrestricted consent requirements are unconstitutional. Poe v. Gerstein, 517 F. 2d 787 (5th Cir. 1975). Its decision was appealed to the United States Supreme Court where it was affirmed, Gerstein v. Coe, 428 U.S. 901, 96 S.Ct. 3202, 49 L.Ed.2d 1205 (1976), on the [*711] basis of Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth, 428 U.S. 52, 96 S.Ct. 2831, 49 L.Ed.2d 788 (1976). The effect of the U.S. Supreme Court mandate in Coe is that the “spousal or parenta…
• DiNATALE v. Robert A. Lieberman, M.D., 409 So. 2d 512 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982)
  …ancies in question here. It was passed to replace a prior provision requiring the husband’s consent to an abortion, which was declared unconstitutional in Coe v. Gerstein, 376 F.Supp. 695 (S.D.Fla.1973) aff’d, 517 F. 2d 787 (5th Cir. 1975), affm’d., 428 U.S. 901, 94 S.Ct. 2247, 41 L.Ed.2d 70 (1976).…
• Colautti v. Franklin, 439 U.S. 379 (U.S. 1979)
  …the mother. In light of Danforth, several aspects of the District Court's judgment in the Fitzpatrick case were highly questionable, and that judgment was accordingly vacated and remanded to the District Court for reconsideration. Beal v. Franklin, 428 U. S. 901 (1976). A drastically modified judgment eventuated. The term “viability” could not be deemed vague in itself, and hence the definition of that term in § 2 and the proscription of § 6 (b) against post-viability abortions were sustained. The District…

  ← 1 / 3 →