SPARKS

v.

NORTH CAROLINA; AND WETMORE V. NORTH CAROLINA

Citator

Cited By

• Roberts v. Louisiana, 431 U.S. 633 (U.S. 1977)
  …ath sentence, holding: “Imposition and carrying out of the death penalty [in this case] constitute cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. Roberts v. Louisiana. . ." Ibid. See also Sparks v. North Carolina, 428 U. S. 905 (1976); Green v. Oklahoma, 428 U. S. 907 (1976). [*636] Recognizing that this Court had already decided that a mandatory death sentence could not be imposed for the crime that Harry Roberts committed, the Attorney General of Louisiana initially conc…
• Cole v. Stevenson, 620 F.2d 1055 (4th Cir. 1980)
  …s in which “the procedural requirements have been met.” Maj. op. at 1060. State v. Wetmore, 287 N.C. 344, 353-54, 215 S.E. 2d 51, 56 (1975), vacated and remanded for reconsideration in light of Mullaney v. Wilbur, sub nom. Wetmore v. North Carolina, 428 U.S. 905, 96 S.Ct. 3213, 49 L.Ed.2d 1212 (1976), new trial ordered, 293 N.C. 262, 248 S.E. 2d 338 (1977); State v. Sparks, 285 N.C. 631, 643-44, 207 S.E. 2d 712, 718-20 (1974), vacated and remanded for reconsideration in light of Mullaney v. Wilbur, sub nom.…

  ← 1 / 2 →