HOFFMANN, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY

v.

FIOTO

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Chadwick, 433 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1977)
  …had not yet “received sufficient recognition by the Supreme Court outside the automobile area, or generally, for us to recognize it as a valid exception to the fourth amendment warrant requirement.” 532 F. 2d 773, 781 (1976). We granted certiorari, 429 U. S. 814 (1976). We affirm. (2) In this Court the Government again contends that the Fourth Amendment Warrant Clause protects only interests traditionally identified with the home.2 Recalling the colonial writs of assistance, which were often executed in s…
• Hunt v. Wash. State Apple Advertising Comm'n, 432 U.S. 333 (U.S. 1977)
  …gton apples,5 and enjoined its application. This appeal followed and we postponed further consideration of the question of jurisdiction to the hearing of the case on the [*341] merits sub nom. Holshouser v. Washington State Apple Advertising Comm’n, 429 U. S. 814 (1976). (2) In this Court, as before, the North Carolina officials vigorously contest the Washington Commission’s standing to prosecute this action, either in its own right, or on behalf of that State’s apple industry which it purports to represen…
• Blackledge v. Allison, 431 U.S. 63 (U.S. 1977)
  …absence of counter affidavits conclusively proving their [*71] falsity. The case was therefore remanded for an evidentiary hearing. 533 F. 2d 894. The petitioner warden sought review in this Court, 28 U. S. C. § 1254 (1), and we granted certiorari, 429 U. S. 814, to consider the significant federal question presented. II Whatever might be the situation in an ideal world, the fact is that the guilty plea and the often concomitant plea bargain are important components of this country’s criminal justice syst…