SILVER BELL INDUSTRIES, INC.

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (27 total)

• United States v. Provenzano, 620 F.2d 985 (3d Cir. 1980)
  …elied partially on documents, see 583 F. 2d at 8, although it stated that a hearing normally is held, id at 7; accord United States v. Nemes, 555 F. 2d 51, 54-55 (2d Cir. 1977); United States v. Bianco, 534 F. 2d 501, 508-11 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 822, 97 S.Ct. 73, 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976). If the Government’s documents conclusively demonstrate prior knowledge, we know of no reason why a hearing must be held.26 We have examined the record and the individual claims of taint. We conclude that the distr…
• United States v. Rubin, 609 F.2d 51 (2d Cir. 1979)
  …till provides “the primary guarantee against bringing overly stale criminal charges,” United States v. Marion, 404 U.S. 307, 322, 92 S.Ct. 455, 464, 30 L.Ed.2d 468 (1971); see also United States v. Eucker, 532 F. 2d 249, 255 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 822, 97 S.Ct. 73, 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976). No such showing has been made here. After a thorough hearing Judge Motley found that the delay had not been “due to any [Government] attempt to gain a tactical advantage” and that Rubin had failed to demonstrate…
• Gates v. Henderson, 568 F.2d 830 (2d Cir. 1977)
  …235, 29 L.Ed.2d 697 (1971). This rule accords with our own practice of barring suppression of evidence claims on appeal where there was no suppression motion or objection on trial. United States v. Bianco, 534 F. 2d 501, 508 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 822, 97 S.Ct. 73, 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976); United States v. Indiviglio, 352 F. 2d 276, 277 (2d Cir. 1965) (en banc), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 907, 86 S.Ct. 887, 15 L.Ed.2d 663 (1966). In O’Berry v. Wainwright, 546 F. 2d 1204 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 4…