GLAZER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (26 total)

• United States v. Hewes, 729 F.2d 1302 (11th Cir. 1984)
  …e remedy provided by the Bureau of Prisons. United States v. Mack, 655 F. 2d 843, 846-47 (8th Cir.1981); United States v. Estrada de Castillo, 549 F. 2d 583, 585 (9th Cir.1976); United States v. Glazer, 532 F. 2d 224, 230-31 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 844, 97 S.Ct. 123, 50 L.Ed.2d 115 (1976); cf. United States v. Grose, 687 F. 2d 1298, 1300-01 (10th Cir.1982) (en banc) (holding the constitutional question not premature but not discussing the administrative remedy). We agree with the wisdom of this r…
• United States v. Mays, 549 F.2d 670 (9th Cir. 1977)
  …ess intended to exculpate the defendant and how, but rather whether the witness had a material basis upon which to provide significantly exculpatory information.3 [*683] Thus, in United States v. Lovasco, 532 F. 2d 59 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. granted, 429 U.S. 844, 97 S.Ct. 233, 50 L.Ed.2d 164, 1976, a case presenting a due process claim far less compelling than the one we face here,4 the defendant had been charged with three counts of unlawful possession of handguns stolen from the mails and a fourth count o…
• United States v. Alfredo Fernandez "Chino" "Al" Alfonso, 552 F.2d 605 (5th Cir. 1977)
  …e may “make inquiry into the credibility or weight of the potential testimony of the codefendant” and “is not required to sever on patent fabrication”. 428 F. 2d at 1021. In United States v. Alejandro, 527 F. 2d 423, 428 (5 Cir. 1976) cert. denied, 429 U.S. 844, 97 S.Ct. 124, 50 L.Ed.2d 115, it was recognized that the trial judge may also consider whether the testimony of the codefendant is “contrary to his own penal interest”. There the codefendant had been “caught redhanded” and the court noted: “His eff…