LOVE

v.

UNITED STATES; AND LYON V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. McDONALD, 576 F.2d 1350 (9th Cir. 1978)
  …Cir. 1977). In mail fraud cases, “[o]ne who acts with reckless indifference as to whether a representation is true or false is chargeable as if he had knowledge of its falsity.” United States v. Love, 535 F. 2d 1152, 1158 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 847, 97 S.Ct. 130, 50 L.Ed.2d 119 (1976) (quoting Irwin v. [*1359] United States, 338 F. 2d 770, 774 (9th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 911, 85 S.Ct. 1530, 14 L.Ed.2d 433 (1965)). The government maintains that McDonald’s general knowledge of the A…
• United States v. Gale Nace and Nathan J. Warren, Sr., 561 F.2d 763 (9th Cir. 1977)
  …d. 18 U.S.C. §§ 894, 891(7); United States v. Curdo, 310 F.Supp. 351 (D.Conn.1970). The trial court is in the best position to decide whether a given incident merits a mistrial. United States v. Love, 535 F. 2d [*769] 1152 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 847, 97 S.Ct. 130, 50 L.Ed.2d 119 (1976); United States v. Short, 500 F. 2d 676, 677 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1000, 95 S.Ct. 317, 42 L.Ed.2d 275 (1974); United States v. Faulkenbery, 472 F. 2d 879, 882 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 970, 9…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Lonsdale, 577 F.2d 923 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …heck under 18 U.S.C. § 495, the government must prove that the defendant attempted to circulate such a check by means of a fraudulent representation that it was genuine. See United States v. Watts, 532 F. 2d 1215, 1218 n. 2 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 847, 97 S.Ct. 131, 50 L.Ed.2d 119 (1976); United States v. Brown, 495 F. 2d 593, 597 n. 4 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 965, 95 S.Ct. 226, 42 L.Ed.2d 179 (1974). . Appellant spells his name “Lonsdale;” the endorsement on the check was spelled “Lon…