BENAVIDES

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (29 total)

• United States v. Williams, 622 F.2d 830 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …n banc). . E. g., Stone v. Powell, 428 U.S. at 489-91, 96 S.Ct. at 3050-51; Irvine v. California, 347 U.S. 128, 136, 74 S.Ct. 381, 385, 98 L.Ed. 561 (1954), and especially United States v. Lamas, 608 F. 2d 547, 550 (5th Cir. 1979). . Cert. denied, 429 U.S. 848, 97 S.Ct. 134, 50 L.Ed.2d 121 (1976), modified on other grounds sub nom. United States v. Ashley, 569 F. 2d 975, 979 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 853, 99 S.Ct. 163, 58 L.Ed.2d 159 (1978). . Although the accused in Tucker had been questioned b…
• United States v. Preston, 608 F.2d 626 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …s prejudicial effect. Although certain cases of this Court appear to suggest that bank robbery may in fact be a crime of dishonesty for purposes of Rule 609(a)(2), e. g., United States v. Carden, 5 Cir., 1976, 529 F. 2d 443, 446, cert. denied, 1977, 429 U.S. 848, 97 S.Ct. 134, 50 L.Ed.2d 121 (petty larceny crime of dishonesty under Rule 609(a)(2)), more recent decisions have made clear that this Court takes a very narrow view of “dishonesty" for purposes of Rule 609(a)(2). See, e. g., United States v. Ashle…
• Peter Starr Prod. Co. v. Twin Cont'l Films, Inc., 783 F.2d 1440 (9th Cir. 1986)
  …ringement of any particular right committed while he or she is the owner of it. In general, United States copyright laws do not have extraterritorial effect. See Robert Stigwood Group, Ltd. v. O’Reilly, 530 F. 2d 1096, 1101 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 848, 97 S.Ct. 135, 50 L.Ed.2d 121 (1976). As a result, infringing actions that take place entirely outside the United States are not actionable in United States federal courts. Id. In the present case, Starr’s complaint alleges that Twin infringed Star…

  ← 1 / 2 →