WELD-HARRINGTON

v.

CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (46 total)

• Washington v. Watkins, 655 F.2d 1346 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …d evidence sapped the trial of fundamental fairness — i. e., only if the error was “ ‘material in the sense of a crucial, critical, highly significant factor.’ ” Id. at 907-08 (quoting Hills v. Henderson, 529 F. 2d 397, 401 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 850, 97 S.Ct. 139, 50 L.Ed.2d 124 (1976); accord, Mendiola v. Estelle, 635 F. 2d 487, 491 (5th Cir. 1981)). Significantly, there was no showing in that case that the erroneously admitted hearsay was inaccurate or otherwise unreliable; thus, even thoug…
• United States v. Gleason, 616 F.2d 2 (2d Cir. 1979)
  …hat it was unfair and improper to introduce such new material in a reply summation, citing Moore v. United States, 120 U.S.App.D.C. 173, 344 F. 2d 558, 560 (D.C.Cir. 1965), and United States v. Rubinson, 543 F. 2d 951, 956-66 (2d Cir.) cert. denied, 429 U.S. 850, 97 S.Ct. 139, 50 L.Ed.2d 124 (1976), to which the Government replies that the material was not new but a response, based entirely on exhibits already in evidence, negating Gleason’s claim in his counsel’s summation that Shad-dick invented the $700,…
• United States v. Bubar, 567 F.2d 192 (2d Cir. 1977)
  …and length and especially with extensive summations . . . that claims of prejudice with respect to the prosecutor’s summation would be raised.” United States v. Rubinson, 543 F. 2d 951, 964 (2 Cir.), cert, denied sub nom. Reynolds v. United States, 429 U.S. 850 (1976). Here, as there, such claims have been raised. Bubar, Coffey, Just, Peter Betres and Ronald Betres claim that the United States Attorney’s repeated mention in his rebuttal summation of their failure to produce evidence to rebut elements of t…