WHITE

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (30 total)

• Adams v. United States, 615 F.2d 284 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …9 (5th Cir. 1978); Hejl v. United States, 449 F. 2d 124, 126 (5th Cir. 1971); Johnson v. United States, 404 F. 2d 22, 24 (5th Cir. 1968). See generally Rosario v. American Export-Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc., 531 F. 2d 1227, 1234 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 857, 97 S.Ct. 156, 50 L.Ed.2d 135 (1976). . A contrary interpretation is not suggested by 28 U.S.C. § 4116(a). See also 28 U.S.C. § 2679(b). . The propriety of regulations requiring a claimant to include a statement of money damages does not rest on t…
• Kerry M. Gough in Bankruptcy of Louis Rosen v. Rossmoor Corp., 585 F.2d 381 (9th Cir. 1978)
  …e defendants. We held that the trial court was not foreclosed from entertaining the motions on their merits and remanded with instructions that appellants’ motions be entertained. Gough v. Rossmoor Corp., 533 F. 2d 453 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 857, 97 S.Ct. 155, 50 L.Ed.2d 134 (1976). On the second remand the trial court denied the motions, ruling that the evidence was sufficient to permit the jury to find that there was a common plan between Rossmoor, Crestmark and the Foundation, under whi…
• Sherman v. British Leyland Motors, Ltd., 601 F.2d 429 (9th Cir. 1979)
  …r an ordinary enterprise. Greyhound Computer Corp. at 498. In the last analysis a defendant’s acts, otherwise lawful, must not be unreasonably restrictive of competition. See Gough v. Rossmoor Corp., 487 F. 2d 373, 376 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 857, 97 S.Ct. 155, 50 L.Ed.2d 134 (1976). . Direct evidence of specific intent to control prices or destroy competition is not indispensable when the claim is “founded upon a substantial claim of restraint of trade” — i.e., a § 1 violation. In these ci…