CLEARVIEW CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORP., D/B/A PANEL FAB INTERNATIONAL, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
This case involves an appeal by Clearview Corporation against a jury verdict in favor of Business Development Corp. The appellate court affirmed the lower court's decision, finding sufficient evidence to support the jury's findings and no error in the trial court's refusal to give certain jury instructions.
No, the trial court did not err in refusing to give the requested jury instructions because there was no evidence presented that would have warranted them.
“The record on appeal reveals competent sufficient evidence to sustain the findings of the jury upon which its verdict was rendered.”
Establishes the appellate court's finding that the jury's verdict was supported by evidence.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceClearview Corporation (appellant) appealed a final judgment entered against it after a jury verdict for Business Development Corp. (appellee). Clearvi…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Fraudulent Misrepresentation cases and more on FLexlaw
The defendant, Clearview Corporation, appeals from an adverse final judgment rendered upon a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff, Business Development Corp., d/b/a Panel Fab International, a Florida corporation.
The record on appeal reveals competent sufficient evidence to sustain the findings of the jury upon which its verdict was rendered. See 3 C.J.S. Agency § 175.
*653Appellant contends that the trial court committed error in failing to give certain instructions which it had requested regarding the fraud or false representations of the agent.
The record reveals that there was no evidence which would warrant the giving of the defendant’s requested instructions and we do not find that the trial court committed error in this regard.
The final judgment is therefore
Affirmed.