ELDER EMMITT GLOVER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ELDER EMMITT GLOVER, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
203 So. 2d 676
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1967)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 31 cases
Opinion of the Court
The basic evidence of the defendant’s guilt stems from a confession obtained from him while in custody, after being arrested on suspicion of the crime for which he was convicted. The confession was obtained before Miranda v. State of Arizona, 1966, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694, but the trial was subsequent. It clearly appears that the exactions of Miranda were not met and that the defendant’s rights were prejudiced thereby. The judgment appealed from is reversed and for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith on remand.
Reversed.
WALDEN, C. J., McCAIN, J., and BARNS, PAUL D., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (16 total)
-
McCRAE v. State, 437 So. 2d 1388 (Fla. 1983)…have been raised in prior post-conviction motions under the Rule and have been decided adversely to the movant on their merits. Pitts v. Turner, 362 So. 2d 134 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Neal v. State, 349 So. 2d 844 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977); Mitchell v. State, 203 So. 2d 676 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967), cert. denied, 210 So. 2d 224 (Fla.), cert. denied, 392 U.S. 913, 88 S.Ct. 2073, 20 L.Ed.2d 1371 (1968); Coleman v. State, 183 So. 2d 714 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966). A “second or successive motion for similar relief,” as used in Rule 3.…
-
Woods v. State, 211 So. 2d 248 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)…vis, 49 N.J. 428, 231 A. 2d 205, 207 (1967); State v. McDaniel, 272 N.C. 556, 158 S.E. 2d 874, 880 (1968); Commonwealth v. Sites, 427 Pa. 486, 235 A. 2d 387, 389 (1967). . Clark v. State, Fla.App.1968, 207 So. 2d 481; Glover v. State, Fla.App.1967, 203 So. 2d 676; Jones v. State, Fla.App.1967, 200 So. 2d 574, 576, 577. . Fendley v. United States, 384 P. 2d 923 (5th Cir. 1967). . Id. at 923, 924. . Id. 384 F. 2d at 924.…
-
Silva v. State, 226 So. 2d 231 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969)…PER CURIAM. The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court is affirmed. See Mitchell v. State, 203 So. 2d 676 (Fla.App.1967), cert. den. 392 U.S. 913, 88 S.Ct. 2073, 20 L.Ed.2d 1371, (1968). JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur.…
Previewing 3 of 16 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (U.S. 1966)