DUFAULT ET AL., DBA DIMENSION
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1976-10-04
No. 75-1664
Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Marshall join, dissenting:
429 U.S. 869 Supreme Court of the United States (1976) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Dissent
Mr. Justice Brennan,

Mr. Justice Brennan,

with whom

Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Marshall join, dissenting:

Petitioners were convicted of mailing obscene materials in violation of 18 U. S. C. § 1461. I adhere to the view that this statute is “ ‘clearly overbroad and unconstitutional on its face/ ” see, e. g., Millican v. United States, 418 U. S. 947, 948 (1974) (Brennan, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari), quoting United States v. Orito, 413 U. S. 139, 148 (1973) (Brennan, J., dissenting). 11 therefore would grant certiorari and reverse.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Meyer Goldberg v. Meyer Goldberg and Frances Goldberg, 717 F.2d 290 (6th Cir. 1983)
    …eal, that they are entitled to intervene as of right pursuant to Rule 24(a)(2). Essentially, Rule 24(a)(2) provides a three-prong test for determining an individual’s right to intervene. Blanchard v. Johnson, 532 F. 2d 1074 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 869, 97 S.Ct. 180, 50 L.Ed.2d 149 (1976). That is: On timely application an absentee shall be permitted to intervene if (1) he claims an interest relating to the property or transaction that is the subject of the action, and (2) he is so situated that…
  • Lodge 1380 v. Dennis, 625 F.2d 819 (9th Cir. 1980)
    …neral scheme of section 101(a) more broadly, holding that it protects the right to “full and active participation” in union affairs. Blanchard v. Johnson, 388 F.Supp. 208, 213 (N.D. Ohio 1974), rev’d in part, 532 F. 2d 1074 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 869, 97 S.Ct. 180, 50 L.Ed.2d 149 (1976); see also Sheldon v. O’Callaghan, supra, 497 F. 2d at 1281. We have not yet determined the breadth of section 101(a)(2). The sparse legislative history of LMRDA § 101(a)(2) clearly indicates that Congress intend…
  • The Triax Co. v. TRW, Inc., 724 F.2d 1224 (6th Cir. 1984)
    …hat interest; and (c) that parties already in the litigation cannot adequately protect that interest. Fed.R.Civ.P. 24(a)(2). Goldberg v. Fisher Foods, 717 F. 2d 290, 292, (6th Cir.1983); Blanchard v. Johnson, 532 F. 2d 1074 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 869, 97 S.Ct. 180, 50 L.Ed.2d 149 (1976). See 7A C. Wright and A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1908 (1972). In addition, a motion to intervene must be timely filed. United Airlines v. McDonald, 432 U.S. 385, 97 S.Ct. 2464, 53 L.Ed.2d 423 (1…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw