SMITH ET UX.

v.

JARAMILLO, DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOL BEVERAGE CONTROL OF NEW MEXICO

Citator

Cited By (46 total)

• Cannon v. Univ. of Chicago, 441 U.S. 677 (U.S. 1979)
  …ame); McDaniel v. University of Chicago and Argonne, 548 F. 2d 689 (CA7 1977) (§ 1 of Davis-Bacon Act), cert. denied, 434 U. S. 1033 (1978); Hughes v. Dempsey-Tegeler & Co., 534 F. 2d 156 (CA9) (§ 6 of Securities Exchange Act of 1934), cert. denied, 429 U. S. 896 (1976). It defies reason to believe that in each of these statutes Congress absentmindedly forgot to mention an intended private action. Indeed, the accelerating trend evidenced by these decisions attests to the need to re-examine the Cort analysis.…
• Photo Elecs. Corp. v. John M. England in Bankr. for Ferrex Corp., 581 F.2d 772 (9th Cir. 1978)
  …cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1477, 98 S.Ct. 1477, 55 L.Ed.2d 511 (1978). “The trial court’s Graham findings are binding on appeal if not clearly erroneous.” Saf-Gard Products, Inc. v. Service Products, Inc., 532 F. 2d 1266, 1272 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 896, 97 S.Ct. 258, 50 L.Ed.2d 179 (1976). Patents may be issued properly for inventions which combine elements existing in the prior art if the result is “unusual or surprising.” Great A & P Tea Co. v. Super Market Equipment Corp., 340 U.S. 147, 152, 7…
• Woods v. Holy Cross Hosp., 591 F.2d 1164 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …iled. 335 So. 2d at 805. If a federal court may") constitutionally refer a complicated matter to an auditor or special master, see In re Peterson; Crateo, Inc. v. Intermark, Inc. (In re Crateo, Inc.), 536 F. 2d 862, 867-68 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 896, 97 S.Ct. 259, 50 L.Ed.2d 180 (1976) (reference of complicated matter to special master, reading of master’s report to jury not violation of seventh amendment); Fed.R.Civ.P. 53; 5A J. Moore & J. Lucas, Moore’s Federal Practice 153.14[3], at 3037-38…

  ← 1 / 2 →