THOMAS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (62 total)

• Denzil Williams v. State, 736 So. 2d 699 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)
  …to a legitimate purpose for which it is ordered. United States ex rel. Latimore v. Sielaff, 561 F. 2d 691, 694-96 (7th Cir.1977) (to protect dignity of witness in rape trial); United States v. Eisner, 533 F. 2d 987, 993-94 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 919, 97 S.Ct. 314, 50 L.Ed.2d 286 (1976) (to protect witness with fear of testifying in public); United States ex rel. Bruno v. Herold, 408 F. 2d 125 (2d Cir.1969) (to protect witness afraid of testifying); United States ex rel. Orlando v. Fay, 350 F. 2…
• United States v. McPARTLIN, 595 F.2d 1321 (7th Cir. 1979)
  …[*1341] suggest that it may be reasonable to prosecute both the official who conditions discretionary benefits on bribes and the person who seeks to obtain such benefits. See United States v. Hall, 536 F. 2d 313, 321 (10th Cir. 1976), cert, denied, 429 U.S. 919, 97 S.Ct. 313, 50 L.Ed.2d 285 (1977) (“bribery and extortion are not to be considered mutually exclusive nor does the fact that the alleged victims of the extortion were also bribers nullify anything.”); United States v. Gill, 490 F. 2d 233 (7th Cir…
• United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877 (9th Cir. 1981)
  …ited States v. O’Connor, 635 F. 2d 814, 817 (10th Cir. 1980); United States v. Perrin, 580 F. 2d 730, 736 (5th Cir. 1978), aff’d, 444 U.S. 37, 100 S.Ct. 311, 62 L.Ed.2d 199 (1979); United States v. Hall, 536 F. 2d 313, 327 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 919, 97 S.Ct. '313, 50 L.Ed.2d 285 (1976). The O’Connor court identified the second factor to be the “casual and incidental” nature of the interstate telephone calls in Archer. 635 F. 2d at 818. The transcript of the recorded telephone call on January…

  ← 1 / 3 →