JOKINEN

v.

HENWOOD ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Adams, 634 F.2d 830 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …as an absolute prohibition on all forms of judicial participation in or interference with the plea negotiation process. As the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit explained in United States v. Werker, 535 F. 2d 198, 201 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 926, 97 S.Ct. 330, 50 L.Ed.2d 296 (1976): Rule 11(e)(1) states categorically: “(t)he court shall not participate in any such discussions.” The commentaries regarding this injunction, and consideration of its intendment, leave no room for doubt that its…
• Rodriguez-Fernandez v. Wilkinson, 654 F.2d 1382 (10th Cir. 1981)
  …in application of these rules between an alien, like Rodriguez-Fernandez, who is regarded as standing at the border and one who is a resident in the United States. See also United States v. Casimiro-Benitez, 533 F. 2d 1121 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 926, 97 S.Ct. 329, 50 L.Ed.2d 295 (1976). . The Court pointed out, however, that this case did not involve unusual delay in deportation. 342 U.S. at 546, 72 S.Ct. at 537. . 8 U.S.C. § 1252(c), in pertinent part, reads as follows: “(c) When a final or…
• United States v. Coonan, 839 F.2d 886 (2d Cir. 1988)
  …er exercise of judicial power and the administration of criminal justice in the federal courts that would evade review if not considered [through review of the petition’s merits.] United States v. Werker, 535 F. 2d 198, 200 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 926, 97 S.Ct. 330, 50 L.Ed.2d 296 (1976) (footnote omitted) (emphasis added). Although mandamus may not be used by the government “to circumvent the limitations of the Criminal Appeals Act[, 18 U.S.C. § 3731,]” United States v. Weinstein, 452 F. 2d 704,…

  ← 1 / 2 →