HICKLAND

v.

HICKLAND

Citator

Cited By (38 total)

• United States v. Edwards, 696 F.2d 1277 (11th Cir. 1983)
  …xtrinsic impeachment evidence, inadmissible under Rule 608(b). “It is axiomatic that the trial court must be apprised of the purpose of any inquiry to which objection is made.” United States v. Garcia, 531 F. 2d 1303, 1307 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 941, 97 S.Ct. 359, 50 L.Ed.2d 311 (1976). The trial judge permitted the appellants to state the purpose for the admission of the evidence at several stages in the trial. Despite these opportunities, they never asserted the theory they now advance here —…
• McGILL Inc. v. John Zink Co., 736 F.2d 666 (Fed. Cir. 1984)
  …a whole, including the experts’ testimony, Hayes v. Department of the Navy, 727 F. 2d 1535, 1538 (Fed.Cir.1984); see Control Components, supra; cf. Moraine Products v. ICI America, Inc., 538 F. 2d 134, 146, 191 USPQ 65, 75 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 941, 97 S.Ct. 357, 50 L.Ed.2d 310 (1976), we are convinced that there is no set of facts, consistent with McGill’s interpretation, that is supported by substantial evidence. Thus, McGill’s interpretation of claim 2, a legal conclusion implied from the j…
• United States v. DeFILLIPO, 590 F.2d 1228 (2d Cir. 1979)
  …8, 715-16 (2d Cir. 1978) (Mansfield, J., concurring), United States v. Carrigan, 543 F. 2d 1053, 1057-58 (2d Cir. 1976) (Lumbard, J., concurring), and United States v. Mari, 526 F. 2d 117, 119-21 (2d Cir. 1975) (Oakes, J., concurring), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 941, 97 S.Ct. 359, 50 L.Ed.2d 311 (1976). But the fact remains that a defendant, to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel, must show some specific instance of prejudice resulting from a joint representation. Salomon v. LaValle…