DININO

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Wolf, 561 F.2d 1376 (10th Cir. 1977)
  …Large sums of money were involved which would affect the financial condition of the two corporations controlled and managed by Wolf, and. permits an inference that Wolf knew of them. United States v. Curtis, 537 F. 2d 1091 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 962, 97 S.Ct. 389, 50 L.Ed.2d 330 (1976). The question of intent was one to be determined by the jury. A scheme to defraud is an essential element of a violation of Section 1341, but statutory violation is not accomplished until there has been a use…
• United States v. Anthony Battista (79-5165) T. Anthony Arnone (79-5257) Louis Peraino (79-5258) Bryanston Distribs., 646 F.2d 237 (6th Cir. 1981)
  …es v. Wasserstrom, 571 F. 2d 351 (6th Cir. 1978). In our opinion, Arnone lacked standing to object to the search of property owned by a corporation in which he was a shareholder, United States v. Curtis, 537 F. 2d 1091 (10th Cir. 1976), cert. den., 429 U.S. 962, 97 S.Ct. 389, 50 L.Ed.2d 330 (1976), and for the additional reason that the box containing the film had been abandoned by Newman who had custody of it. United States v. Haddad, 558 F. 2d 968 (9th Cir. 1977). We agree that the search warrant and the…
• United States v. Shovea, 580 F.2d 1382 (10th Cir. 1978)
  …ore, even assuming that Gaias was actually purchasing the p-2-p for Royce International, Robba would nevertheless have no standing as an individual to challenge the search. See: United States v. Curtis, 537 F. 2d 1091 (10th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 962, 97 S.Ct. 389, 50 L.Ed.2d 330 (1976), and cases cited therein. In the final analysis, the reference to the X-ray search in the affidavit did not give rise to error, particularly when, as here: the suitcase was simply X-rayed, and not opened; the X-…