INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION

v.

CENTRAL OF GEORGIA RAILROAD CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• City of Akron v. Akron Ctr. for Reprod. Health, Inc., 462 U.S. 416 (U.S. 1983)
  …ple . . . .” Purity Extract and Tonic Co. v. Lynch, 226 U. S. 192, 204-205 (1912). “There is nothing in the United States Constitution which limits the State’s power to require that medical procedures be done safely . . . .” Sendak v. [*460] Arnold, 429 U. S. 968, 969 (1976) (White, J., dissenting). “The mode and procedure of medical diagnostic procedures is not the business of judges.” Parham v. J. R., 442 U. S. 584, 607-608 (1979). Under the Roe framework, however, the state interest in maternal health ca…
• Deerfield Med. Ctr. v. City OF Deerfield Beach, 661 F.2d 328 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …nics performing first trimester abortions. The requirements interfered with the fundamental right of privacy and were not justified by a compelling state interest. . A three-judge district court in Arnold v. Sendak, 416 F.Supp. 22 (S.D.Ind.), aff’d 429 U.S. 968, 97 S.Ct. 476, 50 L.Ed.2d 579 (1976) implicitly recognized the burden imposed by the limitation of abortion facilities to certain locations when it struck down a statute requiring that all abortions, including those during the first trimester of pre…
• Planned Parenthood Ass'n OF Kan. City v. Ashcroft, 655 F.2d 848 (8th Cir. 1981)
  …cal Clinic, Inc. v. Smith, 478 F.Supp. 233 (S.D.Fla.1979), appeal dismissed, 620 F. 2d 297 (5th Cir. 1980) (various first trimester regulations unconstitutional, including pathologist requirement); Arnold v. Sendak, 416 F.Supp. 22 (N.D.Ind.), aff'd, 429 U.S. 968, 97 S.Ct. 476, 50 L.Ed.2d 579 (1976). Cf. Baird v. Department of Public Health, 599 F. 2d 1098 (1st Cir. 1979) (abortion-neutral regulation of clinic licensing); Abortion Coalition v. Michigan Department of Public Health, 426 F.Supp. 471 (E.D.Mich.…