BRISCOE, GOVERNOR OF TEXAS, ET AL.

v.

LEVI, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161 (U.S. 1977)
• United States v. Larionoff, 431 U.S. 864 (U.S. 1977)
  …nt of a re-enlistment bonus. The District Court ordered that the bonuses be paid, 365 F. Supp. 140 (1973), and the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit affirmed. 175 U. S. App. D. C. 32, 533 F. 2d 1167 (1976). We granted certiorari, 429 U. S. 997 (1976). We affirm. I From early in our history, Congress has provided by statute for payment of a re-enlistment bonus to members of the Armed Services who re-enlisted upon expiration of their term of service, or who agreed to extend their period o…
• Morris v. Gressette, 432 U.S. 491 (U.S. 1977)
  …y period left South Carolina free to implement the new senate reapportionment plan. We noted probable jurisdiction to determine the review-ability of the Attorney General’s failure to interpose a timely objection under § 5 of the Voting Rights Act. 429 U. S. 997 (1976). For the reasons stated below, we affirm. II The ultimate issue in this case concerns the implementation of South Carolina’s reapportionment plan for the State Senate. Since that plan has not been declared by the District Court for the Dist…