WALLACE

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (36 total)

• United States v. Louin Ray Bright, 630 F.2d 804 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …es the failure to do so resulted in a search warrant which [*812] violated the particularity requirement of the Fourth Amendment. The Eighth Circuit was faced with similar arguments in United States v. Davis, 542 F. 2d 743 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1004, 97 S.Ct. 537, 50 L.Ed.2d 616 (1976), and Hanger v. United States, 398 F. 2d 91 (8th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1119, 89 S.Ct. 995, 22 L.Ed.2d 124 (1969). In both cases the police were in possession of some but not all of the serial numbers…
• United States v. Henning Heldt and Duke Snider, 668 F.2d 1238 (D.C. Cir. 1981)
  …cism, e.g., 2 W. LaFave, Search and Seizure § 4.11(d) (1978); The Supreme Court, 1970 Term, 85 Harv.L.Rev. 3, 244-46 (1971), and has been unevenly applied by courts. Compare, e.g., United States v. Davis, 542 F. 2d 743, 745 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1004, 97 S.Ct. 537, 50 L.Ed.2d 616 (1976), and United States v. Wysong, 528 F. 2d 345 (9th Cir. 1976) (both courts characterize as “inadvertent” discovery of items as to which it appears police could have made showing of probable cause to seize, but fail…
• Photovest Corp. v. Fotomat Corp., 606 F.2d 704 (7th Cir. 1979)
  …81 Cal.App.3d 75, 146 Cal.Rptr. 57, 59 (1978) (deed of trust); Osborne v. Cal-Am Financial Corp., 80 Cal.App.3d 259, 145 Cal.Rptr. 584, 589 (1978) (real estate contract); Ohashi v. Verit Industries, 536 F. 2d 849, 853 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1004, 97 S.Ct. 538, 40 L.Ed.2d 616 (stock transfer agreement). Indeed, the doctrine has been applied to franchise agreements. Dayton Time Lock Service, Inc. v. Silent Watchman Corp., 52 Cal.App.3d 1, 124 Cal.Rptr. 678, 683 (1975). Thus Fotomat’s suggesti…