GRENADER ET AL.
v.
SPITZ ET AL.
GRENADER ET AL.
SPITZ ET AL.
429 U.S. 1009
Supreme Court of the United States (1976)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hillard H. Aldrich and Amy Aldrich v. McCULLOCH Props., Inc., 627 F.2d 1036 (10th Cir. 1980)…was largely in their own use and enjoyment, the necessary expectation of profit is missing. See United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. Forman, 421 U.S. at 857, 95 S.Ct. at 2062. See also Grenader v. Spitz, 537 F. 2d 612, 618-19 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1009, 97 S.Ct. 541, 50 L.Ed.2d 619 (1976). Indeed, the facts may show that defendants were under no obligation by contract or promise to provide significant development services for the benefit of purchasers. Furthermore, the obligation to perform minim…
-
United States v. 110-118 Riverside Tenants Corp., 886 F.2d 514 (2d Cir. 1989)…understanding of the term “stock,” the shares of “stock” in the Apartment Corporation are not freely transferable, and they have no value independent of the Lease for the Apartment. See Grenader v. Spitz, 537 F. 2d 612, 617 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1009, 97 S.Ct. 541, 50 L.Ed.2d 619 (1976), Malkin v. United States Dep’t of Treasury-I.R.S., 645 F.Supp. 229, 231 (S.D.N.Y.1986). See also In re Matter of Carmer, 71 N.Y.2d 781, 525 N.E. 2d 734, 530 N.Y.S.2d 88 (1988), State Tax Comm’n v. Shor, 43 N.Y.…