OHRYNOWICZ

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (38 total)

• State v. Bolyea, 520 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 1988)
  …. 1106, 105 S.Ct. 779, 83 L.Ed.2d 774 (1985); United States v. Condit, 621 F. 2d 1096, 1098 (10th Cir.1980); United States v. Loschiavo, 531 F. 2d 659, 662 (2d Cir.1976); Ohrynowicz v. United States, 542 F. 2d 715, 717 n. 8 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1027, 97 S.Ct. 650, 50 L.Ed.2d 630 (1976); Porth v. Templar, 453 F. 2d 330, 332-33 (10th Cir.1971). See United States v. Hearst, 638 F. 2d 1190, 1192 & n. 1 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 938, 101 S.Ct. 2018, 68 L.Ed.2d 325 (1981). Thus, since r…
• La. Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 476 U.S. 355 (U.S. 1986)
  …when the matter to be regulated is purely local and second, when interstate communication is not affected by the state regulation which the FCC would seek to pre-empt. E. g., North Carolina Utilities Comm’n v. FCC, 537 F. 2d 787 (CA4), cert. denied, 429 U. S. 1027 (1976); North Carolina Utilities Comm’n v. FCC, 552 F. 2d 1036 (CA4), cert. denied, 434 U. S. 874 (1977); Puerto Rico Telephone Co. v. FCC, 553 F. 2d 694 (CA1 1977); New York Telephone Co. v. FCC, 631 F. 2d 1059 (CA2 1980). The short answer to this…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Litton Sys., Inc. v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co., 700 F.2d 785 (2d Cir. 1983)
  …ication standard regulations had the effect of placing the FCC’s imprimatur upon the PCA requirement-. See Telerent Leasing Corp., 45 F.C.C.2d 204 (1974), aff’d sub nom. North Carolina Utilities Comm’n v. FCC, 537 F. 2d 787 (4th Cir.), cert, denied, 429 U.S. 1027, 97 S.Ct. 651, 50 L.Ed.2d 631 (1976); AT & T-Mebane Home Telephone Co., 53 F.C.C.2d 473 (1975). It is difficult to see how either of these decisions can be read to qualify the FCC’s earlier, explicit statement that it was not approving the proposed…