M & T CHEMICALS, INC.

v.

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Cintron-Garcia v. Romero-Barcelo, 671 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1982)
  …tion easier to achieve. Similar “limited voting” provisions have been consistently sustained. Hechinger v. Martin, 411 F.Supp. 650 (D.D.C.) (three judge court) (limited voting scheme for the District of Columbia Council sustained), aff’d per curiam, 429 U.S. 1030, 97 S.Ct. 721, 50 L.Ed.2d 742 (1977); LoFrisco v. Schaffer, 341 F.Supp. 743 (D.Conn.1972) (three judge court) (limited voting scheme for the State of Connecticut sustained), aff’d, 409 U.S. 972, 93 S.Ct. 313, 34 L.Ed.2d 236 (1972); Blaikie v. Power,…
• Shearson/American Express, Inc. v. Mann, 814 F.2d 301 (6th Cir. 1987)
  …Cf. M. & T. Chems., Inc. v. International Business Machs. Corp., 403 F.Supp. 1145, 1147 (S.D.N.Y.1975) (will not grant leave to amend complaint if claim is legally insufficient or lacks merit), aff'd mem., 542 F. 2d 1165 (2d Cir.), cert. dismissed, 429 U.S. 1030, 97 S.Ct. 656, 50 L.Ed.2d 637 (1976); Neighborhood Dev. Corp. v. Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, 632 F. 2d 21 (6th Cir.1980) (per curiam) (not abuse of discretion to deny motion for leave to amend complaint if it would not withstand a mot…