CHASTEEN

v.

OKLAHOMA

Citator

Cited By

• Hicklin v. Orbeck, 437 U.S. 518 (U.S. 1978)
  …(1915) — if they have any remaining vitality, see Sugarman v. Dougall, 413 U. S. 634, 643-645 (1973); C. D. R. Enterprises, Ltd. v. Board of Education, 412 F. Supp. 1164 (EDNY 1976), summarily aff’d sub nom. Lefkowitz v. C. D. R. Enterprises, Ltd., 429 U. S. 1031 (1977)— do not suggest otherwise. In those cases, a New York statute that limited employment “in the construction of public works” to United States citizens and also required that an employment preference be given to New York citizens in such projec…
• Playboy Enters., Inc. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n OF Puerto RICO, 906 F.2d 25 (1st Cir. 1990)
  …tate statutes” for purposes of the Three Judge Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2281, this Circuit considers Puerto Rico a "State" within the meaning of § 1983. Ortiz v. Hernandez Colon, 511 F. 2d 1080, 1081-83 (1st Cir.1975), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 429 U.S. 1031, 97 S.Ct. 721, 50 L.Ed.2d 742 (1977); Berrios v. Inter Am. University, 535 F. 2d 1330, 1331 (1st Cir.1976). For this reason, and because at this point plaintiffs seek only injunctive relief, not damages which might threaten the Commonwealth's trea…
• Cintron-Garcia v. Romero-Barcelo, 671 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1982)
  …reapportionment cases — see Wise v. Lipscomb, 437 U.S. 535, 540, 98 S.Ct. 2493, 2497, 57 L.Ed.2d 411 (1978) — and others as well — see Ortiz v. Hernandez Colon, 385 F.Supp. 111 (D.P.R.1974) (three judge court) (see 511 F. 2d 1080 (1st Cir. 1975) and 429 U.S. 1031, 97 S.Ct. 721, 50 L.Ed.2d 742 (1977)). This approach suggests a belief that the public, as a general rule, is likely to suffer less adverse an impact from the presence of an “unconstitutionally selected” legislator than it is from direct judicial…