LAKE OSWEGO SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 7 ET AL.

v.

HUTCHISON

Citator

Cited By

• Jackson v. Hayakawa, 682 F.2d 1344 (9th Cir. 1982)
  …nction, ability to sue or be sued, power to take property in its own name or in the name of the State, and corporate status of the entity.” Hutchison v. Lake Oswego School District No. 7, 519 F. 2d 961, 966 (9th Cir. 1975), vacated on other grounds, 429 U.S. 1033, 97 S.Ct. 725, 90 L.Ed.2d 744 (1977). To determine these factors, the court will look at the way state law treats the governmental entity. Rutledge v. Arizona Board of Regents, 660 F. 2d at 1349. The district court was correct in characterizing the…
• Clanton v. Orleans Parish Sch. Bd., 649 F.2d 1084 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …has failed to uncover a single case in which a public official has been held personally liable for back-pay under Title VII. But cf. Hutchison v. Lake Oswego School District, 519 F. 2d 961, 968 (9th Cir. 1975), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 429 U.S. 1033, 97 S.Ct. 725, 50 L.Ed.2d 744 (1977) (holding defense of qualified immunity available in Title VII suit for backpay against individual school board members; specific issue whether Title VII authorizes backpay awards against such officials neither ra…
• Durning v. Citibank, N.A., 950 F.2d 1419 (9th Cir. 1991)
  …lief. Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123, 28 S.Ct. 441, 52 L.Ed. 714 (1908). Because the Durnings sought only damages, Young does not apply here. . The Authority relies upon Hutchison v. Lake Oswego School District, 519 F. 2d 961 (9th Cir.1975), vacated, 429 U.S. 1033, 97 S.Ct. 725, 50 L.Ed.2d 744 (1977), for the proposition that this first Mitchell factor weighs in favor of a finding of sovereign immunity if the amount of a judgment for the plaintiff would likely exceed the limited resources of the defendant ent…

  ← 1 / 2 →