FLOYD

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Moore v. State, 485 So. 2d 1368 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)
  …1975, the Public Defender for the Second Circuit sought review by the Florida Supreme Court, which was denied. Moore v. State, 336 So. 2d 1183 (Fla.1976). The United States Supreme Court refused to grant review on January 10, 1977. Moore v. Florida, 429 U.S. 1046, 97 S.Ct. 751, 50 L.Ed.2d 759 (1977). Represented by the Public Defender for the Second Circuit, appellant sought habeas corpus relief in the Federal District Court for the Middle District of Florida, alleging that the trial court violated his cons…
• United States v. Conroy, 589 F.2d 1258 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …3; United States v. Emery, 1 Cir. 1977, 541 F. 2d 887; United States v. Hufford, 9 Cir. 1976, 539 F. 2d 32, cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1002, 97 S.Ct. 533, 50 L.Ed.2d 614; United States v. Frazier, 8 [*1264] Cir. 1976, 538 F. 2d 1322, cert. denied, 1977, 429 U.S. 1046, 97 S.Ct. 751, 50 L.Ed.2d 759. Nonetheless we note that here, unlike Holmes, there was no trespass6 when the beeper was installed for Budal had the right to be on board the vessel; moreover, there was probable caiise to believe that the NAHOA would…
• United States v. Earna Jean Pringle and Harold Elston, 576 F.2d 1114 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …326 F.Supp. 533, 536 (S.D.N.Y.1971); United States v. Sohnen, 298 F.Supp. 51, 55 (E.D.N.Y.1969). . Accord, United States v. Moore, 562 F. 2d 106, 112-113 (1st Cir. 1977); United States v. Frazier, 538 F. 2d 1322, 1325 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1046, 97 S.Ct. 751, 50 L.Ed.2d 759 (1977). The Ninth Circuit takes a contrary view. It holds that the use of beepers in such situations is not a search, since there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in the movements of a car on the highway because…