MORITA

v.

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP

Citator

Cited By (37 total)

• United States v. MacDONALD, 456 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1982)
  …g whether the Speedy Trial Clause has been violated. See, e. g., United States v. Hillegas, 578 F. 2d 453, 457-458 (CA2 1978); [*8] Arnold v. McCarthy, 566 F. 2d 1377, 1383 (CA9 1978); United States v. Martin, 543 F. 2d 577 (CA6 1976), cert. denied, 429 U. S. 1050 (1977); United States v. Bishton, 150 U. S. App. D. C. 51, 55, 463 F. 2d. 887, 891 (1972). The Fifth Circuit reached a seemingly contrary result in United States v. Avalos, 541 F. 2d 1100 (1976), cert. denied, 430 U. S. 970 (1977). However in that c…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Williams, 604 F.2d 1102 (8th Cir. 1979)
  …Officer [*1119] Clark’s association with Ms. Flack. We cannot agree that the trial court abused its discretion in restricting further cross-examination. Fed.R.Evid. 611(b); e. g., United States v. Drake, 542 F. 2d 1020 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1050, 97 S.Ct. 762, 50 L.Ed.2d 766 (1977). We agree with the trial court that further inquiry would have been irrelevant. Morgan next argues that the trial court erred in refusing to strike a juror for cause. Morgan argues that juror Helen M. Dahl shoul…
• United States v. Bustillo, 789 F.2d 1364 (9th Cir. 1986)
  …reasonable belief, the Government maintained the burden of disproving the affirmative defense. See United States v. Guess, 629 F. 2d 573, 577 n. 4 (9th Cir.1980); United States v. Hermosillo-Nanez, 545 F. 2d 1230, 1232 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1050, 97 S.Ct. 763, 50 L.Ed.2d 767 (1977). The Government’s case is made more difficult by a seemingly anomalous jury [*1367] verdict, which found Bustillo guilty of unauthorized use, but not guilty of the crime which allegedly motivated that use. Becau…