OMERNICK

v.

CROOKS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Oregon v. Elstad, 470 U.S. 298 (U.S. 1985)
  …ll-equipped to pinch-hit for counsel, construing the murky and difficult questions of when “custody” begins or whether a given unwarned statement will ultimately be held admissible. See Tanner v. Vincent, 541 F. 2d 932, 936 (CA2 1976), cert. denied, 429 U. S. 1065 (1977). This Court has never embraced the theory that a defendant’s ignorance of the full consequences of his decisions vitiates their voluntariness. See California v. Beheler, 463 U. S., at 1125-1126, n. 3; McMann v. Richardson, 397 U. S. 759, 769…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Schmidt, 573 F.2d 1057 (9th Cir. 1978)
  …les the confessor from making a usable one after those conditions have been removed.” United States v. Bayer, 331 U.S. 532, 540-41, 67 S.Ct. 1394, 1398, 91 L.Ed. 1654 (1946). See Tanner v. Vincent, 541 F. 2d 932, 936-37 (2 Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1065, 97 S.Ct. 794, 50 L.Ed .2d 782 (1977); United States v. Toral, 536 F. 2d 893, 896 (9 Cir. 1976); Knott v. Howard, 511 F. 2d 1060 (1 Cir. 1975); United States v. Shea, 436 F. 2d 740 (9 Cir. 1970); United States v. Knight, 395 F. 2d 971 (2 Cir. 1968),…
• Alexander v. Smith, 582 F.2d 212 (2d Cir. 1978)
  …der’s confession to Assistant District Attorney DiBenedetto was voluntary. This finding of fact is, of course, entitled to a presumption of correctness, 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d); accord, Tanner v. Vincent, 541 F. 2d 932, 937 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1065, 97 S.Ct. 794, 50 L.Ed.2d 782 (1977), unless one of the eight exceptions specified in 28 U.S.C. §§ 2254(d)(l)-(8) can be shown to exist or unless Alexander can bear “the burden of establishing by convincing evidence that the findings of fact by the…