SECOND AVENUE LIMITED DIVIDEND HOUSING ASSN. ET AL.

v.

HILLS, SECRETARY, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (82 total)

• United States v. Orange Jell Beechum, 582 F.2d 898 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …ted States v. Evans, 572 F. 2d 455, 484 n. 38 (5th Cir. 1978); United States v. Bradford, 571 F. 2d 1351, 1353 n. 1 (5th Cir. 1978). Although language in the panel opinion in United States v. Bloom, 538 F. 2d 704, 708 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1074, 97 S.Ct. 814, 50 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977), seems to indicate that Broadway and the cases following it are consistent with the Federal Rules of Evidence, that language is clearly dictum. Bloom held the extrinsic offense evidence admissible under the stric…
• MCI Commc'ns Corp. & MCI Telecomms. Corp. v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co., 708 F.2d 1081 (7th Cir. 1983)
  …competition, this court should hold that behavior to constitute unlawful predatory pricing. In support of this “profit maximization” theory, MCI cites a trio of cases. Hanson v. Shell Oil Co., 541 F. 2d 1352, 1358 n. 5 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1074, 97 S.Ct. 813, 50 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977); International Air Industries, Inc. v. American Excelsior Co., 517 F. 2d 714, 724 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 943, 96 S.Ct. 1411, 47 L.Ed.2d 349 (1976); ILC Peripherals Leasing Corp. v. IBM Corp., 458…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. ITT Cont'l Baking Co., Inc., 668 F.2d 1014 (9th Cir. 1981)
  …only a brief review of these prior cases to demonstrate that this Circuit has adopted the marginal cost test as the standard for measuring what constitutes predatory pricing. In Hanson v. Shell Oil Co., 541 F. 2d 1352 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1074, 97 S.Ct. 813, 50 L.Ed.2d 792 (1977) {Hanson), we affirmed a directed verdict entered in favor of the defendant where, as here, the plaintiff had introduced no evidence that the defendant’s prices were less than its marginal cost. In so doing we cle…

  ← 1 / 4 →