RAITPORT

v.

COMMISSIONERS OF CECIL COUNTY

Citator

Cited By

• Furey v. City OF Sacramento, 780 F.2d 1448 (9th Cir. 1986)
  …equent exercise of the government’s police power restricts the landowner’s ability to make use of the improvement. See Avco Community Developers, Inc. v. South Coast Regional Commission, 17 Cal.3d 785, 132 Cal.Rptr. 386, 553 P. 2d 546, cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1083, 97 S.Ct. 1089, 51 L.Ed.2d 529 (1976). The regulatory acts of government may result in detriment or benefit to landowners. Generally, however, government neither insures against the former nor seeks recompense for the latter. Thus, a private landow…
• Resolution Tr. Corp. for Broadview Fed. Sav. Bank v. Town OF Highland Beach, 18 F.3d 1536 (11th Cir. 1994)
  …c. v. South Coast Regional Comm’n, 17 Cal.3d 785, 132 Cal.Rptr. 386, 553 P. 2d 546, (1976) (creation of vested right where developer performs substantial work and incurs substantial liability on good faith reliance on building permit), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1083, 97 S.Ct. 1089, 51 L.Ed.2d 529 (1977). While we recognize “that there is no property right in possession of” a building permit, we have consistently held that property interests and vested rights may arise from zoning and permit approvals. Marine…